Wikipedia:Robot/Cereri de aprobare

De la Wikipedia, enciclopedia liberă
Jump to navigation Jump to search
For non-Romanian speakers
Wibot.jpg
Before you can run a bot on the Romanian Wikipedia, you must first get it approved. The bot policy here is the same as that on the English Wikipedia. See detailed information there.

For performing new tasks with an account previously approved, please place your request here.

Add a new request

Pentru a rula un robot acesta trebuie să fie aprobat de comunitate. Această pagină este locul unde se depun cererile pentru acordarea statutului de robot. Cererile de aprobare a modificării activității unui robot deja aprobat trebuie depuse la Wikipedia:Sarcini pentru roboți.

Pentru fiecare cerere discuțiile durează 7 zile. Decizia se ia în funcție de argumentele pro și contra aduse de utilizatori. Criteriile de care trebuie ținut cont sînt:

  • Modificările făcute de robot trebuie să fie utile.
  • Robotul nu trebuie să dăuneze prin activitatea lui.

După primirea aprobării, robotul va trece în general printr-o perioadă de probe în urma căreia, dacă eventualele nereguli au fost corectate, contul respectiv va primi statutul de robot. Acesta poate fi setat de către birocrați.

Rularea unui robot fără respectarea regulilor poate duce la blocarea lui imediată, fără avertisment, pe termen nelimitat.

Unelte[modificare sursă]

Cereri curente[modificare sursă]

Texvc2LaTeXBot[modificare sursă]

  • Bot: Texvc2LaTeXBot
  • Operator: Debenben (and Salix alba, responsible for English speaking projects)
  • Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic
  • Programming Language(s): Python
  • Function Summary: Replace deprecated math syntax listed in mw:Extension:Math/Roadmap
  • Already has a bot flag in: arwiki, dewiki, enwiki, eswiki, frwiki, nlwiki, plwiki, zhwiki, approved for operation without botflag on itwiki, svwiki

See w:en:WP:Bots/Requests_for_approval/Texvc2LaTeXBot, phab:T197925, mw:Extension:Math/Roadmap and phab:T195861 for a more detailed description of the bot and the associated migration project. Unfortunately we do not speak Romanian, so it would be nice if we could get help in translating the edit summary and userpage. Also feel free to join our commission to discuss the proposed improvements to the math extension. I would let it also run on pages that just contain less problematic deprecated syntax (around 50 pages).--Debenben (discuție) 10 noiembrie 2018 13:42 (EET)

Please do a few test changes, then wait for a week. If not objections have been raised, you can request the flag on meta (no local bureaucrats).--Strainu (دسستي‎)  10 noiembrie 2018 17:03 (EET)
@Strainu: Thanks. Can I use "Înlocuirea sintaxei LaTeX depreciate în funcție de mw:Extension:Math/Roadmap" as editsummary?--Debenben (discuție) 14 noiembrie 2018 19:47 (EET)
@Debenben: Better use "Înlocuirea sintaxei LaTeX învechite, conform mw:Extension:Math/Roadmap". Strainu to confirm. //  Gikü  vorbe  fapte  14 noiembrie 2018 20:23 (EET)
I agree with Gikü.--Strainu (دسستي‎)  14 noiembrie 2018 22:54 (EET)

JJMC89 bot[modificare sursă]

  • Bot: JJMC89 bot
  • Operator: JJMC89
  • Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic
  • Programming Language(s): Python sourcecode
  • Function Summary: Replace BSicons
    1. Redirects are replaced with their target.
    2. BSicons are replaced as specified on Commons.
  • Already has a bot flag in: bnwiki, cawiki, cswiki, dawiki, dewiki, enwiki, eswiki, fiwiki, frwiki, hrwiki, huwiki, idwiki, itwiki, jawiki, kawiki, nlwiki, nowiki, plwiki, ruwiki, srwiki, svwiki, zhwiki, commons

Please verify that the edit summary has been appropriately translated. This task was requested because the route diagram templates don't use syntax recognized by global replace / CommonsDelinker. —JJMC89 (discuție) 10 septembrie 2017 11:57 (EEST)

Hi JJMC89, thanks for applying. I unblocked the bot account, but please refrain from further edits until this discussion is formally closed (about a week from now) - I believe the current edits are sufficient for an informed opinion.
I would like to clarify how is the list on Commons generated. I see that visually the icons are identical, but I would like to understand the changes from a semantic PoV. Could you indicate some discussion that was base for that list? Thanks.--Strainu (دسستي‎)  10 septembrie 2017 17:42 (EEST)
Jc86035, are you able to answer Strainu's inquiry above? JJMC89 (discuție) 10 septembrie 2017 20:07 (EEST)
@Strainu: Basically, those are the icons in commons:Category:Icons for railway descriptions/obsolete which can be replaced automatically by the bot (left side obsolete, right side replacement). Most of the images in the category were added to it before 2015 without contest, I think. For more recent obsolete icons, instead of categorizing them, since we have the bot we would just replace duplicates' usage and request their deletion. Jc86035 (discuție) 11 septembrie 2017 04:29 (EEST)

Pentru. CC Dan Mihai Pitea--Strainu (دسستي‎)  11 septembrie 2017 14:04 (EEST)

JJMC89, since nobody else expressed their opinion for 10 days, I believe you can now request the flag at meta:SRB.--Strainu (دسستي‎)  21 septembrie 2017 20:34 (EEST)

Yes check.svg Realizat. The bot is now flagged. JJMC89 (discuție) 22 septembrie 2017 06:59 (EEST)

Arhive[modificare sursă]