Discuție Wikipedia:Robot/Cereri de aprobare
Activitate robot[modificare sursă]
Uitaţi-vă la RobotQuistnix. De exemplu aici, unde a şters eo şi pl. Patru zile mai tîrziu ele au fost adăugate de Robbot. Poate îmi scapă mie ceva. – Laurap\ mesaj 19 iulie 2006 16:52 (EEST)
- Într-adevăr, foarte interesant. M-am uitat în istoria articolului polonez. Acolo RobotQuistnix nu operează (cel puţin la articolul ăsta nu apare în istorie). Din cele câteva modificări de anul acesta, nu apare nici una care să aibă legătură cu ro. Articolul nu a fost mutat la alt titlu, ca să zicem că nu mai corespundea. Robbot a modificat articolul tot pe 19, punând interwiki. Nu-mi dau seama nici eu prin ce modalitate a ajuns la concluzia că trebuie scoase acele legături. Să-l întrebăm pe creator? — KlaudiuMihăilă Mesaj 19 iulie 2006 17:36 (EEST)
Din nou despre RobotQuistnix: Aici. La ay.wp în istoricul articolului nu văd nimic ce-ar justifica această ştergere. – Laurap\ mesaj 13 august 2006 19:40 (EEST)
- I-am scris "stăpînului": Quistnix. Să vedem ce ne răspunde. — AdiJapan ☎ 14 august 2006 05:44 (EEST)
- I am not sure what exactly happened. I ran RobotQuistnix in a slightly different way than normal. From time to time, I do that to clean up bad links that would otherwise block robots from doing their work properly (bots normally are programmed to add, not to delete, interwikilinks. Pages that have links to other pages that were deleted, will remain unchanged forever). Probably some pages didn't come through and RobotQuistnix deleted the interwikilinks. This is not a real problem, since interwikilinks that do exist, will soon be re-added by other bots. - Quistnix 14 august 2006 07:43 (EEST)
- Looking at the history of B again, I would say that my bot did the right thing, and the bot that visited the page later was linking to incorrect pages again. Disambiguation pages won't be linked to non-disambiguation pages, and vice versa. nl:B was changed into a disambiguation page recently, and af:B doesn't exist, which made automatic linking impossible. Probably the disambiguation template list in the other bot wasn't up to date - Quistnix 14 august 2006 08:07 (EEST)
- The removal of the link to cr: on Wikipedia was correct, the removal of the link to ay: was an error. But with the link to cr: still on the page, other bots could not work on it. That is the reason for me to run my bot in a different mode from time to time - Quistnix 14 august 2006 08:13 (EEST)
- I am not sure what exactly happened. I ran RobotQuistnix in a slightly different way than normal. From time to time, I do that to clean up bad links that would otherwise block robots from doing their work properly (bots normally are programmed to add, not to delete, interwikilinks. Pages that have links to other pages that were deleted, will remain unchanged forever). Probably some pages didn't come through and RobotQuistnix deleted the interwikilinks. This is not a real problem, since interwikilinks that do exist, will soon be re-added by other bots. - Quistnix 14 august 2006 07:43 (EEST)
Robot pentru obiecte NGC[modificare sursă]
Bună seara! Se poate crea un robot care să creeze articole despre obiecte NGC? Mulțumesc! --FonAfon (discuție) 6 iulie 2019 00:42 (EEST)
- Asemenea cereri se depun la WP:SR. Strainu (دسستي) 6 iulie 2019 10:55 (EEST)